01 | 002 | text

[resultofwar]

Does anyone actually know how off-Barge contact yesterday was made possible? Or is that another Barge secret inmates aren't allowed to know about until they have a warden to check in with first?

Comments

Private

[resultofwar]

Presumably that I'll want to sabotage the ship.

Toshiko Sato.

Re: Private

[needshumility.livejournal.com]

Which is... a possibility to be wary of, I'm sure. It's possibly a danger from anyone on board.

I can ask if there's anything that can be made publicly avaliable, without putting everyone at risk. I don't think questions should go unanswered.

Private

[resultofwar]

It's understandable. It's more personal curiosity. If it's sensitive information, they have every right to want to monitor who has access to it.

But I have no interest in destroying the ship.

Re: Private

[needshumility.livejournal.com]

Do you have any way of showing that to them?

I'm sure they have inmates down there, working. Maybe you could volunteer?

Private

[resultofwar]

I'm not sure.

Maybe. Apparently I need to be assigned in order to be trustworthy at all.

Re: Private

[needshumility.livejournal.com]

How does that make you instantly trustworthy?

Private

[resultofwar]

I've been wondering the same thing.

Re: Private

[needshumility.livejournal.com]

I'm told we get information on our inmates. Maybe that's why?

[Frown.]

I'm not entirely sure.

Private

[resultofwar]

When I am assigned, I'd like to think my information will stay private.

Re: Private

[needshumility.livejournal.com]

Well, I'd like to think so too.

But, I suppose, if you had someone who'd do the murder as soon as you put them near knives, you might need a warden who knows this to say 'don't let them in the kitchen'? That's the only reason I can think of.

Private

[resultofwar]

And I'd agree with you.